What Is the Point of Confirmation?

Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Philosophically, one of the most important questions in the enterprise termed confirmation theory is this: Why should one stick to well confirmed theories rather than to any other theories? This paper discusses the answers to this question one gets from absolute and incremental Bayesian confirmation theory. According to absolute confirmation, one should accept ''absolutely well confirmed'' theories, because absolute confirmation takes one to true theories. An examination of two popular measures of incremental confirmation suggests the view that one should stick to incrementally well confirmed theories, because incremental confirmation takes one to (the most) informative (among all) true theories. However, incremental confirmation does not further this goal in general. I close by presenting a necessary and sufficient condition for revealing the confirmational structure in almost every world when presented separating data.
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Bayes or Bust.Earman, John

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bayesian Confirmation: A Means with No End.Brössel, Peter & Huber, Franz

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
218 ( #14,746 of 41,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #20,538 of 41,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.