The Duty to Disregard the Law

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the practice of jury nullification, a jury votes to acquit a defendant in disregard of the factual evidence, on the grounds that a conviction would result in injustice, either because the law itself is unjust or because its application in the particular case would be unjust. The practice is widely condemned by courts, which strenuously attempt to prevent it. Nevertheless, the arguments against jury nullification are surprisingly weak. I argue that, pursuant to the general ethical duty to avoid causing unjust harms to others, jurors are often morally obligated to disregard the law. (~7400 words)
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUETDT
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-03-19
Latest version: 2 (2018-03-31)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-03-19

Total views
10,591 ( #113 of 2,427,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
396 ( #927 of 2,427,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.