Consistency and evidence

Philosophical Studies 169 (2):333-338 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Williamson (2000) appeals to considerations about when it is natural to say that a hypothesis is consistent with one’s evidence in order to motivate the claim that all and only knowledge is evidence. It is argued here that the relevant considerations do not support this claim, and in fact conflict with it
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-10-17
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
224 ( #27,625 of 2,448,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #47,403 of 2,448,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.