Consistency and evidence

Philosophical Studies 169 (2):333-338 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Williamson (2000) appeals to considerations about when it is natural to say that a hypothesis is consistent with one’s evidence in order to motivate the claim that all and only knowledge is evidence. It is argued here that the relevant considerations do not support this claim, and in fact conflict with it
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUGCAE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Without Justification.Sutton, Jonathan
Theory of Knowledge.Chisholm, Roderick M.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-08-09

Total views
155 ( #18,397 of 40,131 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #27,770 of 40,131 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.