Consistency and evidence

Philosophical Studies 169 (2):333-338 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Williamson (2000) appeals to considerations about when it is natural to say that a hypothesis is consistent with one’s evidence in order to motivate the claim that all and only knowledge is evidence. It is argued here that the relevant considerations do not support this claim, and in fact conflict with it

Author's Profile

Nick Hughes
Oxford University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-09

Downloads
292 (#30,585)

6 months
50 (#25,921)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?