Egalitarian Provision of Necessary Medical Treatment

The Journal of Ethics 24 (1):55-78 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Considerations of autonomy and independence, properly understood, support strictly egalitarian provision of necessary medical treatment. If the financially better-off can purchase access to necessary medical treatments that the financially less well-off cannot purchase without help, then their discretionary power to give or to withhold monetary gifts indirectly gives them the power to make life-and-death or sickness-and-health decisions for others. To prevent private citizens from having this objectionable form of power, government must ensure that citizens’ finances do not affect their access to medical treatments that significantly prolong life, relieve suffering, or cure or mitigate disabilities. Government should ensure this even if doing so involves leveling down and even if it is unclear whether egalitarian provision of necessary treatment would provide better care to the poor than a less egalitarian health care system would.

Author's Profile

Robert C. Hughes
Rutgers Business School–Newark and New Brunswick

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-01

Downloads
438 (#33,271)

6 months
129 (#21,608)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?