Tracking the Moral Truth: Debunking Street’s Darwinian Dilemma

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Sharon Street’s 2006 article “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value” challenges the epistemological pretensions of the moral realist, of the nonnaturalist in particular. Given that “Evolutionary forces have played a tremendous role in shaping the content of human evaluative attitudes” – why should one suppose such attitudes and concomitant beliefs would track an independent moral reality? Especially since, on a nonnaturalist view, moral truth is causally inert. I abstract a logical skeleton of Street’s argument and, with its aid, focus on problematic assumptions regarding the (a)causality of moral truth. It emerges that there are acquired causal powers that compensate for the intrinsic impotence of moral truth, as well as two distinct levels at which truth-tracking might occur. I argue that while evolution’s selective forces do not track moral truth, that does not imply individual organisms could not have evolved that capability.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HULTTM-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-05-14
Latest version: 1 (2015-06-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-05-15

Total views
463 ( #10,912 of 56,054 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #11,356 of 56,054 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.