The epistemic account of faultless disagreement

Synthese 197 (6):2613-2630 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There seem to be cases where A believes p, and B believes not-p, but neither makes a mistake. This is known as faultless disagreement. According to the epistemic account, in at least some cases of faultless disagreement either A or B must believe something false, and the disagreement is faultless in the sense that each follows the epistemic norm. Recently, philosophers have raised various objections to this account. In this paper, I propose a new version of the epistemic account and show how it can handle those objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-12-20
Latest version: 2 (2020-12-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
116 ( #38,149 of 2,426,348 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #22,060 of 2,426,348 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.