Realismul în filosofia politică: un moralism deghizat

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper is an intervention in the dispute about the moralism of the recent realist trend in political philosophy. It is particularly focused on analysing the debate on this subject between Niklas Erman and Eva Möller (2015a; 2015b) and Robert Jubb and Enzo Rossi (2015a; 2015b). Examining the main arguments of both parties, I argue that realists (i.e., Jubb and Rossi) lost the debate, that realism is, in fact, moralism in disguise, and that its main methodological request – giving up „pre-political” moral principles and values in political philosophy – is „unrealistic” (i.e., unfeasible).
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUZRNF
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-04

Total views
133 ( #37,122 of 2,439,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #56,453 of 2,439,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.