Normality and actual causal strength

Cognition 161 (C):80-93 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Existing research suggests that people's judgments of actual causation can be influenced by the degree to which they regard certain events as normal. We develop an explanation for this phenomenon that draws on standard tools from the literature on graphical causal models and, in particular, on the idea of probabilistic sampling. Using these tools, we propose a new measure of actual causal strength. This measure accurately captures three effects of normality on causal judgment that have been observed in existing studies. More importantly, the measure predicts a new effect ("abnormal deflation"). Two studies show that people's judgments do, in fact, show this new effect. Taken together, the patterns of people's causal judgments thereby provide support for the proposed explanation.

Author Profiles

Thomas Icard
Stanford University
Joshua Knobe
Yale University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-25

Downloads
719 (#10,963)

6 months
132 (#5,334)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?