Who needs intuitions? Two Experimentalist Critiques

In Anthony Robert Booth & Darrell P. Rowbottom (eds.), Intuitions. Oxford University Press. pp. 232-256 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A number of philosophers have recently suggested that the role of intuitions in the epistemology of armchair philosophy has been exaggerated. This suggestion is rehearsed and endorsed. What bearing does the rejection of the centrality of intuition in armchair philosophy have on experimentalist critiques of the latter? I distinguish two very different kinds of experimentalist critique: one critique requires the centrality of intuition; the other does not.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ICHWNI
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Intuitions.Andow, James

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
257 ( #10,135 of 37,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #17,145 of 37,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.