The Consent Solution to Punishment and the Explicit Denial Objection

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently, David Boonin has put forward several objections to Carlos S. Nino's 'Consensual Theory of Punishment'. In this paper I will defend Nino against the 'explicit denial objection'. I will discuss whether Boonin's interpretation of Nino as a tacit consent theorist is right. I will argue that the offender's consent is neither tacit nor express, but a special category of implicit consent. Further, for Nino the legal-normative consequences of an act (of crime) are 'irrevocable', i.e. one cannot (expressly and successfully) deny liability to them. I will suggest an explanation for Nino's irrevocability claim
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
0495-4548
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IMBTCS
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
193 ( #23,522 of 52,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #16,036 of 52,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.