Why is (Claiming) Ignorance of the Law no Excuse?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I will discuss two aspects of ignorance of the law: ignorance of illegality (including mistaking the law) and ignorance of the penalty; and I will look at the implications for natives, for tourists and for immigrants. I will argue that Carlos Nino's consensual theory of punishment need to rely on two premises in order to justify that (claiming) ignorance of the law is no excuse. The first premise explains why individuals are presumed to 'know' current laws. The second premise explains why individuals are presumed to 'know' new legislation.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IMBWIC
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-09-28

Total views
1,308 ( #2,387 of 54,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
356 ( #939 of 54,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.