Knowledge-to-fact arguments can deliver knowledge

Analysis 78 (1):52-56 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Murali Ramachandran endorses a principle that he thinks can help us solve the surprise test puzzle and cause problems for a Williamsonian argument against KK principles. But in this paper I argue that his principle is false and as a result it cannot do either.

Author's Profile

Daniel Immerman
University of Notre Dame (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-31

Downloads
743 (#25,248)

6 months
145 (#34,923)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?