Guilt, Practical Identity, and Moral Staining

Philosophy 92 (4):623-645 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The guilt left by immoral actions is why moral duties are more pressing and serious than other reasons like prudential considerations. Religions talk of sin and karma; the secular still speak of spots or stains. I argue that a moral staining view of guilt is in fact the best model. It accounts for guilt's reflexive character and for anxious, scrupulous worries about whether one has transgressed. To understand moral staining, I borrow Christine Korsgaard's view that we construct our identities as agents through our actions. The contribution of immoral actions to self-constitution explains why moral obligations have priority and importance.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
INGGPI
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Pride, Shame and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment.Thomas, Laurence & Taylor, Gabriele

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-19

Total views
174 ( #16,316 of 39,660 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #7,130 of 39,660 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.