Guilt, Practical Identity, and Moral Staining

Philosophy 92 (4):623-645 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The guilt left by immoral actions is why moral duties are more pressing and serious than other reasons like prudential considerations. Religions talk of sin and karma; the secular still speak of spots or stains. I argue that a moral staining view of guilt is in fact the best model. It accounts for guilt's reflexive character and for anxious, scrupulous worries about whether one has transgressed. To understand moral staining, I borrow Christine Korsgaard's view that we construct our identities as agents through our actions. The contribution of immoral actions to self-constitution explains why moral obligations have priority and importance.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-10-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
446 ( #17,082 of 70,088 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #30,646 of 70,088 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.