Temporal Parity and the Problem of Change

SATS 2 (2):60-79 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I discuss the general form of arguments that profess to prove that the view that things endure in tensed time through causally produced change (the dynamic view) must be false because it involves contradictions. I argue that these arguments implicitly presuppose what has been called the temporal parity thesis, i.e. that all moments of time are equally existent and real, and that this thesis must be understood as the denial of the dynamic view. When this implicit premise is made explicit, the arguments turn out to be either circular, they presuppose what they profess to prove, or mere demonstrations of the fact that the dynamic view is incompatible with its own negation. Furthermore, I discuss the metaphysical consequences of accepting the temporal parity thesis, arguing that it deprives us of the means to provide natural explanations to empirical phenomena.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-01-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Four-Dimensionalism.Sider, Theodore
On Passage and Persistence.Carter, William R. & Hestevold, H. Scott

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Causal Production as Interaction.Ingthorsson, Rognvaldur
The Elusive Appearance of Time.Ingthorsson, Rögnvaldur

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
299 ( #10,713 of 41,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #10,004 of 41,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.