De Re Essentialism, Species, and Modal Ambiguity

Metaphysica 15 (1) (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I offer a concise critique of a recurring line of reasoning advanced by Joseph LaPorte and Samir Okasha that all modern species concepts render the view that biological organisms essentially belong to their species empirically untenable. The argument, I claim, trades on a crucial modal ambiguity that collapses the de re/de dicto distinction. Contra their claim that the continued adherence of such a view on behalf of contemporary metaphysicians stems from the latter’s ignorance of developments in modern biology, the modal ambiguity reveals the need to retrain in modal metaphysics
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-03-13
Latest version: 2 (2014-03-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
436 ( #18,462 of 72,589 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #34,392 of 72,589 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.