Mechanisms, counterfactuals and laws

In Stuart Glennan & Phyllis Illari (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 144-156 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this chapter we examine the relation between mechanisms and laws/counterfactuals by revisiting the main notions of mechanism found in the literature. We distinguish between two different conceptions of ‘mechanism’: mechanisms-of underlie or constitute a causal process; mechanisms-for are complex systems that function so as to produce a certain behavior. According to some mechanists, a mechanism fulfills both of these roles simultaneously. The main argument of the chapter is that there is an asymmetrical dependence between both kinds of mechanisms and laws/counterfactuals: while some laws and counterfactuals must be taken as primitive (non-mechanistic) facts of the world, all mechanisms depend on laws/counterfactuals.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative.Bechtel, William & Abrahamsen, Adele
Functional Analysis.Cummins, Robert

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mechanisms in Practice: A Methodological Approach.Ioannidis, Stavros & Psillos, Stathis

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
101 ( #23,786 of 39,938 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #14,890 of 39,938 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.