Software is an abstract artifact

Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1):55-72 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Software is a ubiquitous artifact, yet not much has been done to understand its ontological nature. There are a few accounts offered so far about the nature of software. I argue that none of those accounts give a plausible picture of the nature of software. I draw attention to the striking similarities between software and musical works. These similarities motivate to look more closely on the discussions regarding the nature of the musical works. With the lessons drawn from the ontology of musical works I offer a novel account of the nature of software. In this account, software is an abstract artifact. I elaborate the conditions under which software comes into existence; how it persists; how and on which entities its existence depends.
Categories
Reprint years
2012
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IRMSIA
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-01-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-01-07

Total views
1,644 ( #1,471 of 51,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
131 ( #3,332 of 51,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.