Post-Truth Conceptual Engineering

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1–16 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptual engineering is the method for assessing and improving our concepts. Some have recently claimed that the implementation of such method in the form of ameliorative projects is truth-driven and should thus be epistemically constrained, ultimately at least (Simion 2018; cf. Podosky 2018). This paper challenges that claim on the assumption of a social constructionist analysis of ideologies, and provides an alternative, pragmatic and cognitive framework for determining the legitimacy of ameliorative conceptual projects overall. The upshot is that one should not ameliorate for the sake of truth or knowledge, in the case of ideologies—at least, not primarily.

Author's Profile

Manuel Gustavo Isaac
Swiss National Science Foundation

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-08

Downloads
421 (#20,359)

6 months
78 (#10,140)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?