Blockchain Technology as an Institution of Property

Metaphilosophy 48 (5):666-686 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that the practical implementation of blockchain technology can be considered an institution of property similar to legal institutions. Invoking Penner's theory of property and Hegel's system of property rights, and using the example of bitcoin, it is possible to demonstrate that blockchain effectively implements all necessary and sufficient criteria for property without reliance on legal means. Blockchains eliminate the need for a third-party authority to enforce exclusion rights, and provide a system of universal access to knowledge and discoverability about the property rights of all participants and how the system functions. The implications of these findings are that traditional property relations in society could be replaced by or supplemented with blockchain models, and implemented in new domains.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ISHBTA
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-12-12
Latest version: 3 (2018-02-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Right to Private Property.Waldron, Jeremy & Munzer, Stephen A.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-10

Total views
256 ( #13,021 of 42,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #18,271 of 42,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.