A Quasi-Fregean Solution to ‘The Concept Horse’ Paradox

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I offer a conceptually tighter, quasi-Fregean solution to the concept horse paradox based on the idea that the unterfallen relation is asymmetrical. The solution is conceptually tighter in the sense that it retains the Fregean principle of separating sharply between concepts and objects, it retains Frege’s conclusion that the sentence ‘the concept horse is not a concept’ is true, but does not violate our intuitions on the matter. The solution is only ‘quasi’- Fregean in the sense that it rejects Frege’s claims about the ontological import of natural language and his analysis thereof.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IVAAQS
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thought and Talk.Davidson, Donald

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-29

Total views
38 ( #42,639 of 47,378 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,652 of 47,378 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.