Convention and language

Synthese 117 (3):295-312 (1998)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper has three objectives. The first is to show how David Lewis' influential account of how a population is related to its language requires that speakers be 'conceptually autonomous' in a way that is incompatible with content ascriptions following from the assumption that its speakers share a language. The second objective is to sketch an alternate account of the psychological and sociological facts that relate a population to its language. The third is to suggest a modification of Lewis' account of convention that will allow one to preserve the claim that there are conventions of language.
Reprint years
2004
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JACCAL
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
114 ( #20,260 of 38,083 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #19,876 of 38,083 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.