Foundationalism, coherentism, and rule-following skepticism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Semantic holists view what one's terms mean as function of all of one's usage. Holists will thus be coherentists about semantic justification: showing that one's usage of a term is semantically justified involves showing how it coheres with the rest of one's usage. Semantic atomists, by contrast, understand semantic justification in a foundationalist fashion. Saul Kripke has, on Wittgenstein's behalf, famously argued for a type of skepticism about meaning and semantic justification. However, Kripke's argument has bite only if one understands semantic justification in foundationalist terms. Consequently, Kripke's arguments lead not to a type of skepticism about meaning, but rather to the conclusion that one should be a coherentist about semantic justification, and thus a holist about semantic facts
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JACFCA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
337 ( #19,146 of 2,448,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #30,509 of 2,448,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.