Salvaging Pascal’s Wager

Philosophia Christi 21 (1):59-84 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many think that Pascal’s Wager is a hopeless failure. A primary reason for this is because a number of challenging objections have been raised to the wager, including the “many gods” objection and the “mixed strategy” objection. We argue that both objections are formal, but not substantive, problems for the wager, and that they both fail for the same reason. We then respond to additional objections to the wager. We show how a version of Pascalian reasoning succeeds, giving us a reason to pay special attention to the infinite consequences of our actions.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JACSPW
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-05-29
Latest version: 3 (2019-08-25)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment1.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.
Surreal Decisions.Chen, Eddy Keming & Rubio, Daniel

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-29

Total views
587 ( #5,945 of 47,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
361 ( #950 of 47,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.