Hyperintensional propositions

Synthese 192 (3):585-601 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Propositions play a central role in contemporary semantics. On the Russellian account, propositions are structured entities containing particulars, properties and relations. This contrasts sharply with the sets-of-possible-worlds view of propositions. I’ll discuss how to extend the sets-of-worlds view to accommodate fine-grained hyperintensional contents. When this is done in a satisfactory way, I’ll argue, it makes heavy use of entities very much like Russellian tuples. The two notions of proposition become inter-definable and inter-substitutable: they are not genuinely distinct accounts of how propositions represent what they represent. Semantic theorists may move freely between the two conceptions of what propositions are. Nevertheless, the two approaches give different accounts of the metaphysical nature of propositions. I argue that the sets-of-worlds view provides an adequate account of the nature of propositions, whereas the Russellian view cannot
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-04-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.
Frege's Puzzle.Salmon, Nathan U.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
864 ( #3,361 of 47,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
129 ( #4,118 of 47,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.