A Rejection of Semantic Holism, Based on Linguistic Relativity and Determinism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I will argue that semantic holism is, inherently, a false claim. Semantic holism, here, being defined as the meaning of a word or expression in a given language (λ) is constructed by its relation to other words and expressions in said given language (λ) and its role in said given language (λ). The following premises and examples within the premises support the refutability of semantic holism, including linguistic relativity, culture and linguistic determinism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-12-06
Latest version: 2 (2012-12-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
209 ( #22,730 of 53,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #40,874 of 53,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.