Norms of intentionality: norms that don’t guide

Philosophical Studies 157 (1):1-25 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
More than ever, it is in vogue to argue that no norms either play a role in or directly follow from the theory of mental content. In this paper, I present an intuitive theory of intentionality (including a theory of mental content) on which norms are constitutive of the intentional properties of attitude and content in order to show that this trend is misguided. Although this theory of intentionality—the teleological theory of intentional representation—does involve a commitment to representational norms, these norms are not problematic in the way critics have suggested they would be. In particular, these norms do not guide thinking by motivating intentional agents to (intentionally) accord with them; as a result, no obvious vicious regress threatens the theory. In the final section of this paper, I argue that accepting this teleological theory of intentionality need not commit one to thinking that intentionality is the product of natural selection
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JARNOI
Revision history
Archival date: 2010-10-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine M.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Pragmatic Encroachment and Belief-Desire Psychology.Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins; Jarvis, Benjamin & Rubin, Katherine

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-10-25

Total views
541 ( #5,376 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #9,517 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.