Enhancement and Civic Virtue

Social Theory and Practice 40 (3):499-527 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Opponents of biomedical enhancement frequently adopt what Allen Buchanan has called the “Personal Goods Assumption.” On this assumption, the benefits of biomedical enhancement will accrue primarily to those individuals who undergo enhancements, not to wider society. Buchanan has argued that biomedical enhancements might in fact have substantial social benefits by increasing productivity. We outline another way in which enhancements might benefit wider society: by augmenting civic virtue and thus improving the functioning of our political communities. We thus directly confront critics of biomedical enhancement who argue that it will lead to a loss of social cohesion and a breakdown in political life
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Well-Being and Enhancement.Savulescu, Julian; Sandberg, Anders & Kahane, Guy

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Procedural Moral Enhancement.Schaefer, G. Owen & Savulescu, Julian
Public Attitudes Towards Moral Enhancement. Evidence That Means Matter Morally.Specker, Jona; Schermer, Maartje H. N. & Reiner, Peter B.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
199 ( #21,156 of 48,959 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #15,069 of 48,959 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.