Science Advice in New Zealand: opportunities for development

Policy Quarterly 15 (2):62-71 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the state of play for science advice to the government and Parliament? After almost ten years with a prime minister’s chief science advisor, are there lessons to be learnt? How can we continue to ensure that science advice is effective, balanced, transparent and rigorous, while at the same time balancing the need for discretion and confidentiality? In this article, we suggest that the hallmarks of good science – transparency and peer review – can be balanced against the need to provide confidential advice in an Aotearoa New Zealand context. To complement the advice to the prime minister, an expanded role for the Royal Society Te Apärangi would support public and parliamentary understanding of science and science issues relevant to policy.

Author's Profile

Ben Jeffares
Australian National University (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-26

Downloads
58 (#92,373)

6 months
58 (#77,264)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?