Symposium: Are Certain Knowledge Frameworks More Congenial to the Aims of Cross-Cultural Philosophy?

Journal of World Philosophies 2 (2):99-107 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In “Global Knowledge Frameworks and the Tasks of Cross-Cultural Philosophy,” Leigh Jenco searches for the conception of knowledge that best justifies the judgment that one can learn from non-local traditions of philosophy. Jenco considers four conceptions of knowledge, namely, in catchwords, the esoteric, Enlightenment, hermeneutic, and self- transformative conceptions of knowledge, and she defends the latter as more plausible than the former three. In this critical discussion of Jenco’s article, I provide reason to doubt the self-transformative conception, and also advance a fifth, pluralist conception of knowledge that I contend best explains the prospect of learning from traditions other than one’s own.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JENSAC-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-04

Total views
261 ( #17,145 of 50,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #9,996 of 50,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.