Is Coherentism Coherent?

Analysis 67 (4):341 - 344 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In ‘A reductio of coherentism’ (Analysis 67, 2007) Tom Stoneham offers a novel argument against epistemological coherentism. ‘On the face of it’, he writes, ‘the argument gives a conclusive reductio ad absurdum of any coherence theory of justification. But that cannot be right, can it?’ (p. 254). It could be right, but it isn’t. I argue that coherentists need not accept the central premises of Stoneham’s argument and that, even if these premises were acceptable and true, Stoneham’s reductio would not follow.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-03-02
Latest version: 1 (2016-03-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
294 ( #23,528 of 65,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #49,933 of 65,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.