Warrant, defeaters, and the epistemic basis of religious belief

In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I critically examine two features of Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology. (i) If basic theistic beliefs are threatened by defeaters (of various kinds) and thus must be defended by higher-order defeaters in order to remain rational and warranted, are they still “properly basic”? (ii) Does Plantinga’s overall account offer an argument that basic theistic beliefs actually are warranted? I answer both questions in the negative.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-03-08
Latest version: 2 (2016-03-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Defeasibility Theory.Grundmann, Thomas

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
188 ( #18,493 of 43,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #12,297 of 43,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.