Folk Psychology and the Bayesian Brain

In Thomas Metzinger & Wanja Wiese (eds.), Philosophy and Predictive Processing. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Whilst much has been said about the implications of predictive processing for our scientific understanding of cognition, there has been comparatively little discussion of how this new paradigm fits with our everyday understanding of the mind, i.e. folk psychology. This paper aims to assess the relationship between folk psychology and predictive processing, which will first require making a distinction between two ways of understanding folk psychology: as propositional attitude psychology and as a broader folk psychological discourse. It will be argued that folk psychology in this broader sense is compatible with predictive processing, despite the fact that there is an apparent incompatibility between predictive processing and a literalist interpretation of propositional attitude psychology. The distinction between these two kinds of folk psychology allows us to accept that our scientific usage of folk concepts requires revision, whilst rejecting the suggestion that we should eliminate folk psychology entirely.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Freedom Evolves.Dennett, Daniel Clement

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Cognitive‐Evolutionary Model of Surprise: A Review of the Evidence. [REVIEW]Reisenzein, Rainer; Horstmann, Gernot & Schützwohl, Achim

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
207 ( #15,917 of 42,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #15,873 of 42,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.