Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task

Science 310 (5745):116-119 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches between intention and outcome, adjust our behavior in the face of error, and adapt to changing circumstances. Is this always the case? We investigated the relation between intention, choice, and introspection. Participants made choices between presented face pairs on the basis of attractiveness, while we covertly manipulated the relationship between choice and outcome that they experienced. Participants failed to notice conspicuous mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome they were presented with, while nevertheless offering introspectively derived reasons for why they chose the way they did. We call this effect choice blindness.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JOHFTD
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Modulating the Sense of Agency with External Cues.Moore, James W.; Wegner, Daniel M. & Haggard, Patrick

View all 77 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
3,631 ( #311 of 44,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
331 ( #1,100 of 44,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.