Modal Ecthesis

History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (2):171-182 (1993)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Fred's semantics for McCall's syntactic presentation of Aristotle's assertoric and apodeictic syllogistic is altered to free it from Thom's objections that it is unAristotelian. The altered semantics rejects Baroco-XLL and Bocardo-LXL, which Thom says Aristotle should have accepted. Aristotle's proofs that use ecthesis are formalized by using singular sentences. With one exception the (acceptance) axioms for McCall's system L-X-M are derivable. Formal proofs are shown to be sound.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JOHME
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-10-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
129 ( #29,527 of 51,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #38,327 of 51,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.