Locke on Real Essences, Intelligibility, and Natural Kinds

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I criticize arguments by Pauline Phemister and Matthew Stuart that John Locke's position in his An Essay Concerning Human Understanding allows for natural kinds based on similarities among real essences. On my reading of Locke, not only are similarities among real essences irrelevant to species, but natural kind theories based on them are unintelligible.
ISBN(s)
1053-8364
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JONLOR
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-08-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
[Handout 12].Mackie, J. L.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-08-19

Total views
628 ( #5,437 of 47,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #11,074 of 47,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.