Defending Wokeness: A Response to Davidson

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6):21-26 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lacey J. Davidson (2023) raises several insightful objections to the group partiality account of wokeness. The paper aims to move the discussion forward by either responding to or developing Davidson’s objections. My goal is not to show that the partiality account is foolproof but to think about the direction of future discussion—future critique, modification, and response. Davidson thinks that the partiality account of wokeness does not sufficiently define wokeness, as the paper sets out to do. Davidson also alleges that the account appropriates the term from minority communities.

Author's Profile

J. Spencer Atkins
State University of New York at Binghamton

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-27

Downloads
152 (#77,861)

6 months
95 (#44,480)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?