consent and deception

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Tom Dougherty has recently defended the claim that all deception that is consequential for sex is seriously wrong. This discussion piece argues that deception does not have to seriously undermine consent and that when sexual deception is seriously wrong, that may not only be to do with its relation to consent. In doing so, it defends distinguishing between the seriousness of deceptions, whether these are sexual or in other areas of life, and so defends what Dougherty calls the lenient view.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Sex, Lies, and Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2013 - Ethics 123 (4):717-744.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Deception and Consent.Tom Dougherty - 2018 - In Peter Schaber & Andreas Müller (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. Routledge.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
234 ( #18,847 of 50,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #31,860 of 50,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.