consent and deception

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Tom Dougherty has recently defended the claim that all deception that is consequential for sex is seriously wrong. This discussion piece argues that deception does not have to seriously undermine consent and that when sexual deception is seriously wrong, that may not only be to do with its relation to consent. In doing so, it defends distinguishing between the seriousness of deceptions, whether these are sexual or in other areas of life, and so defends what Dougherty calls the lenient view.
Keywords
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JUBCAD
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-05-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-05-31

Total views
315 ( #18,904 of 2,432,201 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #32,260 of 2,432,201 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.