Against the ritual of "is" and "ought"

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1):5-16 (1978)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
However much the preoccupations and problems of moral philosophy have changed in the last decade or so, we retain, with a ritual observance, a basic conceptual framework. Apart from a few bold spirits who disregard the ritual, most moral philosophers, before they can say anything, have to re-enact the moves of trying to justify how they dare to move from description to evaluation, while others, opposing them, claim that they have disregarded sacred texts and violated the most sacred of ritual moves. Some, and I would like to count myself among these, would like to argue that the whole ritual is unnecessary, misleading, confused and confusing and even detrimental to moral philosophy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JULATR
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
79 ( #51,435 of 65,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #64,848 of 65,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.