Common Method Variance & Bias dalam Penelitian Psikologis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The issue of common method variance and bias in Indonesia still has not gained much attention; even the terminology is less popular, except among psychometric enthusiasts and experts. In fact, the potential for common method variance and bias infiltrating in research results is very high, especially in studies that use a single method, a single source, and concurrent design, which are highly favored by psychological lecturers and researchers in Indonesia. This paper is a critical review, exposing the debate and serious impact regarding common method variance and bias, as well as procedures for detecting, addressing and correcting its effects. The author hoped this paper contributes in filling the gap in the literature, especially in Psychology Research Methodology text books in the Indonesian language, so that psychological researches in Indonesia continue to increase their quality and to have their better place in international publications.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.Cronbach, Lee J. & Meehl, P. E.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
745 ( #4,223 of 47,276 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
287 ( #1,297 of 47,276 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.