Mill-Frege Compatibalism

Journal of Philosophical Research 27:567-576 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is generally accepted that Mill’s classification of names as nonconnotative terms is incompatible with Frege’s thesis that names have senses. However, Milldescribed the senses of nonconnotative terms—without being aware that he was doing so. These are the senses for names that were sought in vain by Frege. When Mill’s and Frege’s doctrines are understood as complementary, they constitute a fully satisfactory theory of names.

Author's Profile

John Justice
Randolph College

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
1,251 (#10,209)

6 months
262 (#9,813)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?