Why It Is Time To Move Beyond Nagelian Reduction

In D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, M. Stöltzner & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective. Heidelberg, GER: Springer. pp. 255-272 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I argue that it is finally time to move beyond the Nagelian framework and to break new ground in thinking about epistemic reduction in biology. I will do so, not by simply repeating all the old objections that have been raised against Ernest Nagel’s classical model of theory reduction. Rather, I grant that a proponent of Nagel’s approach can handle several of these problems but that, nevertheless, Nagel’s general way of thinking about epistemic reduction in terms of theories and their logical relations is entirely inadequate with respect to what is going on in actual biological research practice.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reduction.Hütterman, A. & Love, A. C.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
271 ( #12,359 of 42,290 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,365 of 42,290 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.