Primitive directionality and diachronic grounding

Acta Analytica:1-17 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Eternalists believe that there is no ontological difference between the past, present and future. Thus, a challenge arises: in virtue of what does time have a direction? Some eternalists (including Maudlin (2007), Oaklander (2012) and Tegtmeier (1996; 2009; 2014; 2016)) argue that the direction of time is primitive. A natural response to positing primitive directionality is the suspicion that said posit is too mysterious to do any explanatory work. The aim of this paper is to relieve primitive directionality of some of its mystery by offering a novel way to understand the phenomenon in terms of the recently popularised notion of grounding.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KAJPDA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On What Grounds What.Schaffer, Jonathan

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-08-10

Total views
30 ( #37,014 of 41,542 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #20,046 of 41,542 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.