Primitive Directionality and Diachronic Grounding

Acta Analytica 35 (2):195-211 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Eternalists believe that there is no ontological difference between the past, present and future. Thus, a challenge arises: in virtue of what does time have a direction? Some eternalists, Oaklander and Tegtmeier ) argue that the direction of time is primitive. A natural response to positing primitive directionality is the suspicion that said posit is too mysterious to do any explanatory work. The aim of this paper is to relieve primitive directionality of some of its mystery by offering a novel way to understand the phenomenon in terms of the recently popularised notion of grounding.

Author Profiles

James Norton
University of Tasmania
Naoyuki Kajimoto
Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Science (CASIP)
Kristie Miller
University of Sydney

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-10

Downloads
702 (#29,155)

6 months
135 (#32,934)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?