Das Recht auf Wissen: Philosophische Untersuchungen der globalen Erwärmung

Problemata 7 (1):192-215 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Hans Jonas and Arne Næss have argued that philosophers need not be concerned with natural sciences even when they talk about enviromental issues like global warming (§1). However, believing sciences blindly is in itself unphilosophical. So we think, in this paper, the other way around: We consider the current view of global warming, which was reported by the IPCC, critically. The so-called AR4 is divided into two parts. One is about the industrial revolutions (§§5-9); the other is about the greenhouse effect (§§11-20). Through this consideration, it will be revealed: the views of the Establishment are not at all absolute; there still remains room to reconsider them.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-07-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
162 ( #30,959 of 58,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #32,771 of 58,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.