Realism, Antirealism, and Conventionalism about Race

Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1039-1052 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper distinguishes three concepts of "race": bio-genomic cluster/race, biological race, and social race. We map out realism, antirealism, and conventionalism about each of these, in three important historical episodes: Frank Livingstone and Theodosius Dobzhansky in 1962, A.W.F. Edwards' 2003 response to Lewontin (1972), and contemporary discourse. Semantics is especially crucial to the first episode, while normativity is central to the second. Upon inspection, each episode also reveals a variety of commitments to the metaphysics of race. We conclude by interrogating the relevance of these scientific discussions for political positions and a post-racial future.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KAPRAA
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-11-11
Latest version: 22 (2014-12-03)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Gould on Morton, Redux: What Can the Debate Reveal About the Limits of Data?Jonathan Kaplan, Massimo Pigliucci & Joshua Banta - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52:22-31.
The Mind, the Lab, and the Field: Three Kinds of Populations in Scientific Practice.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther, Ryan Giordano, Michael D. Edge & Rasmus Nielsen - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52:12-21.
Introduction: Genomics and Philosophy of Race.Winther, Rasmus Grønfeldt; Millstein, Roberta L. & Nielsen, Rasmus

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-11-11

Total views
1,695 ( #716 of 39,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
125 ( #2,851 of 39,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.