How (Not) to Make Trade-Offs Between Health and Other Goods

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In the context of a global pandemic, there is good health-based reason for governments to impose various social distancing measures. However, such measures also cause economic and other harms to people at low risk from the virus. In this paper, I examine how to make such trade-offs in a way that is respectfully justifiable to their losers. I argue that existing proposals like using standard QALY (quality-adjusted life-year) valuations or WELLBYs (wellbeing-adjusted life-years) as the currency for trade-offs do not allow such justification, because they give weight to utilities that are irrelevant in a life-and-death context. Drawing on work on restricted aggregation in ethics, I articulate an alternative framework for balancing claims arising from prospects of different kinds of harm and benefit, and show how it can be applied to reasoning about trade-offs in a pandemic context.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-06-12
Latest version: 2 (2021-07-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #41,139 of 2,444,518 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,987 of 2,444,518 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.