Self-regarding supererogatory actions

Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):487–498 (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers, in discussing supererogation, maintain that supererogatory actions must be done for the benefit of others. In this paper I argue that there can be instances of self-regarding supererogatory actions. That is, there are cases in which the primary (or sole) intended beneficiary of a supererogatory action is the agent herself, and she need not be acting out of a concern for morality or moral rules. In such cases the agent still acts suitably 'beyond the call of duty', and in a morally praiseworthy fashion.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KAWSSA
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-06
View other versions
Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
740 (#9,439)

6 months
117 (#5,145)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?