Aristotle, Protagoras, and Contradiction: Metaphysics Γ 4-6

Journal of Ancient Philosophy 7 (2):75-99 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In both Metaphysics Γ 4 and 5 Aristotle argues that Protagoras is committed to the view that all contradictions are true. Yet Aristotle’s arguments are not transparent, and later, in Γ 6, he provides Protagoras with a way to escape contradictions. In this paper I try to understand Aristotle’s arguments. After examining a number of possible solutions, I conclude that the best way of explaining them is to (a) recognize that Aristotle is discussing a number of Protagorean opponents, and (b) import another of Protagoras’ views, namely the claim that there are always two logoi opposed to one another.

Author's Profile

Evan Keeling
University of São Paulo

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
1,105 (#10,011)

6 months
215 (#9,969)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?