The “All Lives Matter” response: QUD-shifting as epistemic injustice

Synthese:1-19 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper uses the “All Lives Matter” response to the “Black Lives Matter” slogan as a case study in epistemic injustice by shifting the Question Under Discussion. Drawing on recent work in formal pragmatic theory, I show that the manipulation of discourse structure—in particular, by way of shifting the Question Under Discussion mid-discourse—can constitute an act of epistemic injustice. I argue that the “All Lives Matter” response to the “Black Lives Matter” slogan is one such case; this response shifts the Question Under Discussion governing the overarching discourse from Do Black lives matter? to Which lives matter? This manipulation of the discourse structure systematically obscures the intended meaning of “Black lives matter” and disincentivizes future utterances of it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-05-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #58,009 of 2,427,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #34,103 of 2,427,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.