What is Proof of Concept Research and how does it Generate Epistemic and Ethical Categories for Future Scientific Practice?

Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):735-753 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
“Proof of concept” is a phrase frequently used in descriptions of research sought in program announcements, in experimental studies, and in the marketing of new technologies. It is often coupled with either a short definition or none at all, its meaning assumed to be fully understood. This is problematic. As a phrase with potential implications for research and technology, its assumed meaning requires some analysis to avoid it becoming a descriptive category that refers to all things scientifically exciting. I provide a short analysis of proof of concept research and offer an example of it within synthetic biology. I suggest that not only are there activities that circumscribe new epistemological categories but there are also associated normative ethical categories or principles linked to the research. I examine these and provide an outline for an alternative ethical account to describe these activities that I refer to as “extended agency ethics”. This view is used to explain how the type of research described as proof of concept also provides an attendant proof of principle that is the result of decision-making that extends across practitioners, their tools, techniques, and the problem solving activities of other research groups.
Reprint years
2016
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KENWIP
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-08-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-05-26

Total views
408 ( #15,675 of 2,448,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #13,247 of 2,448,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.