Communication and indexical reference

Philosophical Studies 149 (3):355 - 366 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the debate over what determines the reference of an indexical expression on a given occasion of use, we can distinguish between two generic positions. According to the first, the reference is determined by internal factors, such as the speaker’s intentions. According to the second, the reference is determined by external factors, like conventions or what a competent and attentive audience would take the reference to be. It has recently been argued that the first position is untenable, since there are cases of mismatch where the intuitively correct reference differs from the one that would be determined by the relevant internal factors. The aim of this paper is to show that, contrary to this line of argument, it is the proponent of the second position that should be worried, since this position yields counterintuitive consequences regarding communicative success in cases of mismatch.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KERCAI
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Almog, Joseph; Perry, John & Wettstein, Howard (eds.)
The Varieties of Reference.Antony, Louise M.; Evans, Gareth & McDowell, John
Pursuit of Truth.QUINE, W. V.
Who Is I.Corazza, Eros; Fish, William & Gorvett, Jonathan

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-02-16

Total views
385 ( #8,872 of 43,739 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #32,782 of 43,739 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.